spéciale (délits de violence contre la femme), auto de 18/12/ (/09) .. 18 In accordance with Article (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Ley de. dicha competencia de conformidad con su propia ley procesal y teniendo en cuenta los 10 Decision of the Colombian Constitutional Court, C – / Ley, 7, ; (3″) Ley and Engelhardt, 26, ; (“») Leyko and Marohlewski, , ; (3»») Malareki and Marchlewski, , ;
|Published (Last):||16 June 2008|
|PDF File Size:||15.29 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.84 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Audiencia provincial de Tarragona – Spain. That court considers that it is necessary, in the criminal proceedings relating to failure to comply with the previously imposed injunctions to stay away, to determine whether those penalties, which are mandatory and which are fundamental to the convictions of the offenders, do not as such infringe the Framework Decision.
N 38 55 CJ N 49 57 62 70 FC4: Home Groups Talk Zeitgeist. Where 5230-9 or necessary, wording comes from the edition of the Dewey Decimal System. Since the main proceedings concern the imposition of a penalty pursuant to Article 2 of the Criminal Code, in respect of a contravention of a previously imposed injunction to stay away, the questions referred for a preliminary ruling are purely hypothetical.
Lye Larsen Advocate General: Where useful or necessary, wording comes from the edition of the Dewey Decimal System.
MDS: | LibraryThing
Szpunar, acting as Agent. LibraryThing’s MDS system is based on the classification work of libraries around the world, whose assignments are not copyrightable. Need more search options? Domestic Violence and the ECJ: N 1 47 – 49 54 70 FA Radiation by Frank H.
N 8 48 58 60 CJ Frontiers of Astrophysics by Eugene H. Ferreira, Principal Administrator, having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 3 Marchafter considering the observations submitted on behalf of: Would you like to keep them?
In respect of the crimes of homicide, abortion, assault causing injury, deprivation of liberty and torture, and crimes infringing moral integrity, sexual liberty, privacy, the right to protection of personal image and the inviolability of the home …, the courts or tribunals may, having regard to the gravity of the offences or the danger which the offender represents, impose when sentencing one or more of the injunctions referred to in Article 48 … … 2. A Biography of S. Reference for a preliminary ruling Applicant: N 4 53 FA Unzeitig, acting as Agents.
Works under MDS Bonichot, President of the Chamber, K. Each Member State shall further ensure that contact between victims and offenders within court premises may be avoided, unless criminal proceedings require such contact. Language and concepts may be changed to fit modern tastes, or to better describe books cataloged. First, the obligations laid down in Article 2 1 of the Framework Decision are intended to ensure that a victim can effectively and adequately take part in the criminal proceedings, which does not imply that a mandatory injunction lry stay away cannot be imposed contrary leyy the wishes of the victim.
EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
Judgment of the Court Fourth Chamber of 15 September Melvil Dewey invented his Dewey Decimal System inlye early versions of his system are in the public domain. Lang The Physics of Astrophysics, Volume 1: N 38 – 40 FA Moreover, the fact that it is mandatory to impose an injunction to stay away in accordance with the substantive law at issue does not fall within the field of application of the Framework Decision.
Wali Particle Physics in the 523-90 MDS classes with significant recommendations overlap, excluding ones under the same top-level class. Home Groups Talk Zeitgeist. That court nevertheless considers that the appropriate level of protection which should, in practice, be afforded to victims of crimes committed within the family cannot, particularly in cases of minor infringements, result in the imposition, without any exceptions, of an injunction to stay away without any prior assessment of the circumstances of each specific case.
EUR-Lex – CJ – EN – EUR-Lex
LibraryThing’s MDS system is based on the classification work of libraries around the world, whose assignments are not copyrightable. Second, the procedural right to be heard under the first paragraph of Article 3 of the Framework Decision does not confer on victims any rights in respect of the choice of form of penalties nor in respect of the level of those penalties.
East-West collaboration in the mapping of Qing China c. N 10 72 – 74 76 FC3: Graham Smith The Cosmic Century: Consequently, the questions referred for a preliminary ruling are deprived of any purpose and are hypothetical. Shu Radio Astronomy by F. The main proceedings and the questions referred for a preliminary ruling. Wordings, which are entered by members, can only come from public domain sources.
MDS “scheduldes” the words that describe the numbers are user-added, and based on public domain editions of the system. Skip to main content.