Editorial Reviews. Review. “Domscheit-Berg speaks with the authority that few others posess.” —Businessworld “For citizens around the globe who are attracted . Daniel Domscheit-Berg reveals the inner workings of WikiLeaks under the leadership of Julian Assange. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange lost control of his site’s submission Domscheit-Berg, who was known as Daniel Schmitt during his nearly.
|Published (Last):||28 July 2009|
|PDF File Size:||10.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.92 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That’s a bit jarring! Autorul cartii si Asange au bazele Wikileaks impreuna si au coordonat activitatea organizatiei ani in sir.
Inside WikiLeaks, by Daniel Domscheit-Berg – The Globe and Mail
Germany portal Biography portal. I find it unfortunate that Domscheit-Berg’s decentralized approach with Openleaks appears not to be working, if the lack of dynamism on the current website is any indication. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way.
If you want to write domsvheit-berg letter to the editor, please forward to letters globeandmail. Despite the close partnership, Domscheit-Berg remained something like the tech-support guy.
Aug 02, Pantteri4 rated it really liked it. If it’s credible and I have no particular reason to doubt it then Wikileaks is in a real technological pickle.
It’s believable that Assange is an asshole. His book seems to be little more than a veiled continuation of a running battle with Julian Assange. Domcheit-berg 03, Peter rated it it was ok Recommends it for: Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
There were discrepancies however with while most of the domscheit-verg was freely available there were paypal accounts for donations that accrued a lot of money and they experimented with the idea of auctioning information to the highest bidder obviously among news agencies. So, I might defend that my review was solely based on the way the book flowed. May 06, David Roberts rated it it was amazing. Retrieved from ” https: WikiLeaks, on the other hand, could be dysfunctional if Berg’s account is accurate, yet it still appears to function.
We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. WikiLeaks List of charges in United States v.
Last summer, just as WikiLeaks was publicizing its most significant revelations about the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, it was also suffering its greatest setbacks. Iar ceea ce se spune despre Asange nu e prea roz. Archived from the original on 13 December Archived from the original on 26 July It is my opinion that WikiLeaks died when Daniel left, and it is now a plaything of a celebrity spoiled sociopath.
Fallings out aside, the WikiLeaks experiment has proved that a handful of motivated computer wwikileaks with a powerful idea can pry open the vaults of secret government documents in domscheit-erg way no one else can. Fascinating account of the rise and fall? At insside, the two men shared small apartments. WikiLeaks and Assange need no introduction.
But, in the aftermath, it seems that Berg and the original core IT team at WikiLeaks couldn’t do much better in launching their own platform, OpenLeaks. This could be just par-for-the-course fabulous confabulation on Assange’s part, as Berg’s side of the story gently suggests. It does have elements of the he said, she said, It may have been rushed to market a bit to play off Assange’s Swedish rape charges and British hearing.
There were discrepancies however with while most of the information was freely available there were payp The domscheti-berg I read to research this post was Inside WikiLeaks by Daniel Domscheit-Berg et al which is an excellent book which I bought at a car boot sale.
As it happened, he had himself pressed the wrong button on our mailing list at one point so thatpeople received repeated e-mails. O organizatie imensa, mii de voluntari care sorteaza documentele, sute de servere ascunse in intreaga lumea, donatii de sute de mii de dolari etc.
Refresh and try again. Fantastic account on the roots of WikiLeaks becoming a political player rather than an engine for the democratization of information and a whistleblowers’ safe heaven and publication outlet. However, on 23 December Domscheit-Berg announced on the website that the organisation would not go ahead as previously intended and would now only focus on spreading information and expertise regarding how to set up and run leak websites rather than directly facilitating leaks themselves.
I’m not sure we’ll ever find out what is the whole truth was. My problem was that we shared not only a room but a large double bed,” the author writes of one occasion. I’m a print subscriber, link to my account Subscribe to comment Why do I need to subscribe? I also have to say that I can’t help but feel a little bit taken advantage of by Mr. There is another similar site to this at http: WikiLeaks could be utilizing their users’ submissions to advance its own agenda in some fashion.
That said, given the libertarian, solo nature of what drives many hacker or quasi-hacker types on the Web, I fear that is easier said than done. I don’t doubt your own ability to spearhead that subject independently.