George Athanassakos is a Professor of Finance and the Ben Graham Chair in Value Investing at Ivey Business School. He has been ranked among the top by Dr. George Athanassakos, Professor of Finance, Ben Graham Chair in Value Investing and Director, Ben Graham Centre of Value Investing – Ivey Business. Dr. George Athanassakos. Professor of Finance Ben Graham Chair in Value Investing & Founder & Managing Director, Ben Graham Centre for Value Investing.
|Published (Last):||21 February 2015|
|PDF File Size:||2.36 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
We document a consistently strong value premium in all markets examined, which persists in both bull and bear markets, as well as in recessions and recoveries.
Public lecture by Dr. George Athanassakos (30/5/16) | Athens University of Economics and Business
He is author of numerous academic research papers and of two athanassakow, Derivatives Fundamentals and Equity Valuation. Research Publications To search for publications by a specific faculty member, select the database and georgs select the name from the Geogge drop down menu.
We document a consistently strong value premium over our sample period, which persists in both bull and bear markets, as well as in recessions and recoveries.
The paper utilizes a more comprehensive set of data and tests than previous studies and a research methodology that minimizes potential data snooping problems and confounding inferences. This article attempts to demonstrate that Internet venture valuations are not subject to different valuation standards and rules, even though one needs to expand on the traditional valuation approach to make it applicable to internet valuations. Second, to examine whether an additional screening to the first step of the value investing process can be employed to separate the good value athanassakoz from the bad ones.
Evidence is provided in favour of time diversification, while the current market Practice of life cycle investing is not fully supported as stocks continue to exhibit more favourable risk-return payoffs than other asset classes, even at shorter time intervals.
It is shown athanassakow traditional valuation methods such as the discounted cash flows approach understate value twice first, when risk changes over time and second, when flexibility matters to an investment decision.
We are able to construct a composite score indicator SCOREcombining various fundamental and market metrics, which enable us not only to separate the winners from the losers among value and growth stocks, but also to predict future returns of value and growth stocks. SCORE portfolios give better results for sortings based on PE and when we employed a cross section – time series medians approach.
Public lecture by Dr. George Athanassakos (30/5/16)
Athanassakos has also written articles for the Financial Post and currently writes, as a guest columnist, about investments and economic and financial topics in The Globe and MailCanada’s largest daily newspaper, and the Canadian Investment Review. We find that PE based sortings produce better overall results than sortings based on PB. Designmethodologyapproach – The study is based on a survey of CEOs of a large sample of Canadian companies and examines the relation of a number of explanatory variables, including stock price performance, to the probability of using VBM versus not using VBM via a regression analysis of qualitative choice, namely logit analysis.
We extend this research by examining whether measurable behavioral and personality factors predict investment style, including risk tolerance, time preference, overconfidence, personal evaluation of the investment opportunity, and character strengths. Use “margin of safety” to do portfolio choices and limit risk beyond diversification. This paper sheds further light on the value premium by providing out-of-sample tests using Canadian data over the period and a search process that involves both PE and PBV ratios.
Accede mediante Facebook Accede mediante Twitter Accede mediante mail. First, to determine whether there is value premium in our sample of Canadian non-interlisted and interlisted stocks for the period May 1, April 30, Usted ya se ha pre-inscrito, gracias.
The statistical analysis that follows the tabulation of survey results indicates companies that used EVA had a better stock price performance than those not using EVA. Moreover, our logit regression analysis shows that companies with better stock market performance exhibited higher likelihood of using EVA. We show that there are distinct differences between US exchanges which means that papers that aggregate all US exchanges under one umbrella may dilute findings and bias conclusions.
The second segment provides an opportunity to apply these principles by working on, discussing and demonstrating their application through a number of valuation of real life companies.
The second rule is not to forget the first rule.
A vast literature documents the importance of individual personality in explaining variation in choice, yet many questions remain regarding the egorge of investment choices. The purpose of this paper is two-fold a to determine whether there is value premium in our sample of US stocks for the period May 1, April 30,athaassakos b to examine athanawsakos an additional screening to the first step of the value investing process can be employed to separate the outperforming value and growth stocks from the underperforming ones.
We find that a strong and pervasive value premium exists in Canada over our sample periods that persists in bull and bear markets and during recessionsrecoveries. We show that the value premium is not driven by a few outliers, but it is pervasive as the overwhelming majority of stocks in the value portfolio have positive returns, and the majority of the industries in our sample have positive value premiums.
This indicates that athxnassakos academic research was right in excluding negative multiple firms from athanqssakos analysis. Richard Ivey Building This indicates that prior academic research was right in excluding negative multiple firms from their analysis as inclusion would have affected the homogeneity of their sample and would have diluted their findings and tests of significance.
Results are stronger for interlisted than noninterlisted georgd. En Value School trataremos tus datos personales con el fin de atender tu consulta y ponernos en contacto contigo. Growth stocks exhibit weaker performance than value stocks. As a result, not only must negative PE firms be segregated from positive multiple firms, but also interlisted firms ought to be segregated from non-interlisted firms in related research as aggregation would undermine the clarity and generality of findings, affect the homogeneity of the sample and dilute findings and tests of significance.
In the second half of the year, however, the opposite is true.