In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. This chapter offers a reading of Søren Kierkegaard’s philosophical work Concluding Unscientific Postscript to ‘Philosophical Fragments’ to illuminate his ideas. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 has ratings and 14 reviews. John said: In many ways, this book is necessary w.
|Published (Last):||10 January 2008|
|PDF File Size:||19.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.76 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is not composed of propositions or perceptions of the external world, but of introspection, experiences, and especially one’s relationship with God. No keywords specified fix it. Indirect communication requires appropriation on the part of the receiver. Kierkegaard left the task of discovering the meaning of his works to philosophidal reader, because “the task must be made difficult, for only the difficult inspires pstscript noble-hearted”.
What does this mean for us? Jun 21, Peter rated it it was amazing.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikiquote
Nov 09, Mark Ellis added it. But that would make the identity of the prayer’s addressee utterly irrelevant to the prayer’s status as authentic or inauthentic. Subjective truth is essential or ethico-religious truth. Having made these distinctions, the Postscript then tries to specify the Christian’s peculiar predicament as a sinner seeking salvation in an absurdity. Perhaps the most difficult book I’ve read, but worth the struggle. Cambridge UPp. History, science, and speculative philosophy all deal with objective knowledge.
Johannes Climacus means “John of the Ladder”; it is the sobriquet of a sixth-century abbot, author of the meditative guide The Ladder of Divine Ascent. Find it on Scholar. Jan 10, Dan Borkowski rated it it was amazing. Adeel rated it it was amazing Feb 11, It is humorous, after all Climacus confesses that he is a humorist, yet, I believe it is an important text in which Climacus not only opposes modern speculative thought but gives critcal insight into different subjectivities while approaching the “religious” subject but never reaching or claiming himself.
Danish and English are close enough that it is often possible to retain much of Kierkegaard’s own syntax, phraseology, and even wordplay.
I searched fragmentz web for commentary on this text as I read it and it seems as though many people believe this text to be merely a humorous mockery of modern philosophical inquiry and not much else. I have many of his books. By contrast, the passionless Christian is so far from fulfilling the task of praying to God that he may be regarded as having utterly flouted it namely, as though he were an enthusiast of idolatryeven if he has gotten his prayer’s objective dimension right.
Whether you are Christian or not, though particularly if you are, this book could very well be necessary. Oct 01, Dean added fragmenfs. In English, unfortunately, it is hard to parse the above translations without taking the words “to God” to be the effective referent of “in truth. What is more, it brings Kierkegaard’s painstaking use of grammar, so central to his philosophical method, one step closer to the English reader.
Here is Hannay’s version in full: History and Eternal Happiness. Kierkegaard’s a beautiful writer. Most philosophers are teh writers.
Vivaldi Jean-Marie – – Upa.
As the title suggests, the Postscript is sequel to the earlier Philosophical Fragments. Not that I therefore wanted to relinquish Christianity.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikipedia
Over the course of its nearly pages, the Postscript works to demolish and replace a conventional view of Christianity on which being a true Christian is a matter of objective concern: It is humorous, after all Climacus confesses that he is a humorist, yet, I believe it is an important text in which Climacus not only opposes modern speculative thought but gives critcal insight into different subjectivities while approaching the “religious” subject but never rea I searched the web for commentary on this text as I read it and it seems as though many people believe this text to be merely a humorous mockery lostscript modern philosophical inquiry and not phjlosophical else.
The Postscript ‘s uncomfortable solution is to try to wave at what ppstscript cannot touch. Classical, Early, and Medieval World History: Through the discipline of resignation, aiming at an absolute commitment to the highest good, through the discipline of suffering, through the consciousness of guilt, the way leads step by step to a more profound pathos, until by a leap we reach the absolute maximum of subjectivity in the Christian consciousness of sin, with its imperative unscientitic for a new departure.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments Civil War American History: No, I had another interpretation of it.
The necessity of this leap is what gives offense to man and to all human idealism. In this way, he can appeal to any reader simply delighted in the complexity and movement of language, and not necessarily just the bones-and-grit madcore thinkaholic.
Joe rated it it was amazing Aug 19, According to Climacus, all objective knowledge is subject to doubt. Its spearhead was Walter Lowrie, an Episcopal minister who cast himself as Kierkegaard’s “missionary”, and promoted Kierkegaard’s vision of faith as a bulwark against liberal theology. How can we tell, the Postscript asks, when a prayer to God is authentic?
The philossophical first considers Kierkegaard’s philosopgical about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Hegelianism within the context of the relationship between modernity and Christianity and the relationship of history to faith.
Once again, Hannay provides enough starting information to allow the reader to begin connecting Kierkegaard’s argumentative dots. Richard Arnot Home Bett Cambridge: Direct communication consists of statements that can be communicated and understood without appropriation, that is, without experiencing personally what is being communicated.
The work is a poignant attack against Hegelianismthe philosophy of Hegelespecially Hegel’s Science phioosophical Logic. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. They would facilitate scholarly use enormously.