Daily Kos’ Open Letter to People Who Hate

“An open letter to the people who hate Obama more than they love America”

Dear haters, you are the cruel, heartless misinformed assholes who would sell America out to Haliburton in a heartbeat, you would rather pay ZERO taxes than you would see a newly born baby get access to quality health care, you cheer when we discuss denying health care to young people with preventable diseases, and you boo when we discuss the First Ladies plan to cut back on childhood obesity.

So stop wearing your hate with pride. Stop celebrating your anti-science, anti-math ignorance. Stop using code words to mask your bigotry like “family values”, especially when you hate my family and when you stand on the same stage as a guy who has had three marriages or if you share a seat in the Senate with a guy who cheated on his wife with hookers while wearing diapers. You should be ashamed.

Hat tip to my friend @Blatherskyte

And Now, for Something Completely Different…

I’m pretty good at guessing ahead of time what Hollywood movies will be “successes” or not. This year has some typically huge blockbusters – which ones do you think will be studs vs which ones will be duds? Here’s my picks:

“Avengers” – Bigger than huge.

“The Dark Knight Rises” – Huge.

“Prometheus” – Big but not as big as the above.

“Spider-Man” – dud.

“GI Joe II” – Complete dud.

“Men in Black 3″ – moderate success

“Total Recall 2″ – dud.

“Bourne Legacy” – Moderate success but lower than MIB.

What are some of the Summer 2012 Blockbusters are you looking forward to – or dreading being dragged out to see?

Apple pulls App, Blogger overreacts

I love when others, however unintentionally, help us out with excoriating those who so richly deserve it. Today’s thanks go out to Steven Sande of TUAW for his article, “Apple pulls Bluetooth OnOff switch app from the App Store, blogger overreacts“.

Whenever I see the words “blogger overreacts” in association with a Mac story, my first thought is always, “I wonder if he’s talking about Jason O’Grady?”

Read Sande’s piece to see who he’s reaming out.

Martellaro + Generalizations = Awful

John Martellaro makes it too easy. He’s hit the trifecta of faulty logic, poor writing and just being dead wrong.

His article, “WWDC Ticket Sales: Exactly as Apple Planned it”, wastes no time in getting to the latter. He says:

Apple knew from experience what happend [sic] last year and decided no changes were needed.

Except they tightened the rules regarding tickets – banning scalping, limiting sales to only one per person and five per organization. So yeah – they made changes.

Watering [WWDC] down by expanding the venues, dividing it up and turning it into just another lazy week-long conference (or two) is not what Apple has in mind.

Martellaro has traded on his former employment with Apple for far too long. He has no idea what Apple has in mind for anything, let alone WWDC.

One can only conclude, from the way things went this morning, that events unfolded exactly as Apple wished.

Really? Is that the only thing one could conclude? Might one conclude that Apple indeed had no idea how much more interest WWDC has generated in the past year?

Young developers, in Apple’s view, don’t mind jumping out of bed at 5:30 in the morning

There’s that “in Apple’s view” again. And I’m ignoring the dumb generalization of young developers. There’s more/better/stupider generalizations to come.

In regard to the WWDC ticket sale time, Martellaro says:

Some adjustment had to be made for east coast people who generally are not up very early

OK….WTF? First of all, like all generalizations, it’s wrong. But to be more specific, this generalization is utterly idiotic. How can you posible even let the thought of making a statement that covers everyone on the east coast bubble up through the meat sac you call a brain?

He makes it worse with:

The east coast has major centers for influential TV networks and newspapers, so Apple skewed the timing their way.

Has Martellaro never heard of a place called “Hollywood”? I hear they are pretty big into TV. And I understand that recently, the west coast even got a daily newspaper or two…

Regardless, what the hell does it have to do with WWDC? Is Martellaro saying a primary focus of the conference TV and newspaper developers? I’m sure that will come as a surprise to any number of developers.

On the other hand, the West Coast people tend to move fast, and the developer community in California can darn well fend for itself.

He simply can’t help himself. Another idiotic generalization but with the advantage of also slamming east coasters by intimating they are slow/lazy and need Apple’s help to attend WWDC.

And finally, Martellaro performs the amazing feat of nailing shut his own coffin:

If you’re one of those people who needs a lot of time to make a decision, sip some coffee, read a newspaper, or you need to plead with a supervisor, or you’re not an alert, savvy, young developer accustomed to brisk action, then WWDC isn’t for you. You’re not developer material.

There are thousands of people that don’t work for a supervisor but who also aren’t “young” who most certainly are developers and Martellaro effectively insults each and every one of them.

Let’s hope that the developers who disagree with Martellaro let him know just what kind of asshat he is.

Spilling the Beans – Norton Identity Safe now available

In my day job, I get a lot of press releases announcing everything from the latest cool new products to dumb stuff like “we updated our web site with pretty new graphics!” The vast majority of them are of little interest but occasionally, a gem pops up that has to be commented on.

For those of you unfamiliar, companies will sometimes have embargoes – where they tell the media about their products days or weeks in advance but ask the media to not reveal the details until a particular date and time. You see it often with products from Apple. Ever notice how The Usual Suspects all get their Apple product reviews posted at almost the exact same time? It’s because Apple has contacted them and said, “We’ll let you use our latest toys but you can’t tell anyone about it until this date/time”.

The key is the method I described – the company contacts the journalist and asks if they would like to be involved but constrained by certain ground rules. This allows the journalist to decide whether or not to participate. But what happens when you have a company that sends you a press release with all the details and then tries to put you under embargo, without you ever having agreed to it? This…

Tomorrow [Tuesday], Norton will announce a new, free, secure password manager – Norton Identity Safe – that works on Macs and iOS.

According to a recent survey by Norton, 70 percent of people have forgotten at least one of their passwords in the past month – not surprising, when you consider how many passwords we all have to remember on a daily basis, whether on our home computers, laptops or mobile phones. In fact, when given a choice of several challenging tasks, 40 percent of people indicate remembering all of their passwords is among the top three most difficult – more than those who selected balancing their checkbook.

As a result, people often resort to using weak passwords based on their pets’ or family members’ names or using the same password across multiple sites, leaving them at risk of identity theft and loss of personal information when a hacker cracks one obvious password and gains access to all of their online accounts.

Others keep a physical list of passwords at home – not much use for the 48 percent of people who access online accounts on the go from their mobile device.

The Norton PR person sending out the email then writes, “Below are the press release and screenshots of the product, under embargo until Tuesday, April 24 at 8 a.m. ET/ 5 a.m. PT.”

I never agreed to be embargoed. I have no prior relationship with Norton or this PR person. They never contacted me by phone, email, Twitter, smoke signals….From my point of view, I am under no obligation to “keep their secret”.

You can get this new product, for free, at Norton’s web site.

But contrary to their own press release, it doesn’t seem to be available for the Mac OS yet.

9to5Mac/Gizmodo – Douchenozzles again…

I follow Dan Frakes of Macworld on Twitter. This morning, he RTed this from Marco Tabini:

I’m sure the original author of the article will be grateful for the link back.

(I deleted the link included in the original tweet – you’ll understand the reason why momentarily)

I followed the bread crumbs to the often criticized (by me, at least) 9to5Mac site to an article called “How to unlock an iPhone 4S in 12 easy steps” (again, no link intentional). I read the article, not understanding what Tabini was talking about until I got to the end and see “(via Gizmodo and Singularity)”.

I click on the Gizmodo link and see the same 12 steps and a link to the same Singularity site. Turns out, this is the site Tabini was referring to.

Both 9to5Mac and Gizmodo simply lifted the ”12 easy steps” from the other web site – almost verbatim.

Both of those sites will undoubtedly say, “We included a link to the original!” They did – after they took all the relevant content and made going to the original article completely unnecessary. Both sites also left it until the very end of the “article” to give credit where it was rightfully due.

This is a disturbing trend of a lot of sites - 9to5Mac and Gizmodo are just the latest sleazy examples. I’m sure both of those sites wouldn’t and aren’t happy when their content gets lifted by others – but are more than happy to do it themselves.

Why Instagram cheats the Viewer (no – it doesn’t)

In a piece at CNN, Nick Stern opines on “Why Instagram photos cheat the viewer“. It’s an interesting piece if only for the blinders the author has clamped down over his head.

He bemoans the rise of what he calls ”news images” – ones that have been altered in any number of ways, primarily through apps like Hipstamatic and Instagram. But as a professional news photographer, he should know better. Any reputable news organization does not allow that kind of manipulation to images. So his complaint is a straw man from the very start.

But his specific complain is this:

The app photographer hasn’t spent years learning his or her trade, imagining the scene, waiting for the light to fall just right, swapping lenses and switching angles. They haven’t spent hours in the dark room, leaning over trays of noxious chemicals until the early hours of the morning.

And he’s right. Technology, in any number of ways, has made many skills and talents moot. But it doesn’t mean if you don’t use those skills, you can’t/shouldn’t be taken seriously as a photographer.

I say his blinders are on because, look at what he’s doing – he’s writing on a web site. Did he hand code the page? Did he lovingly write out the HTML required to get that font just that size or that photo in just the right place? No – he used any number of tools to make the process easier for him.

He hypocritically complains about people doing exactly the same thing he’s doing – using technology to make communication easier.

I don’t consider him less of a writer because he didn’t hand code the article and he shouldn’t consider those taking good, newsworthy photos with iPhones any less of a photographer than he is. It’s not about the tools, it’s about your skills and abilities and how you use them.

(hat tip to @amrosario)

“Could” it have happened or *did* it happen?

One of the beauties of the internet is fact checking. It’s made even easier when the people you are fact checking don’t bother to check their own facts.

Alex Heath of Cult of Mac posts this today:

Valve co-founder Gabe Newell recently addressed the rumor that Apple CEO Tim Cook visited his company last week. Newell flat out denied the rumor, originally published by AppleInsider, that Tim Cook visited Valve HQ.

Cult of Mac originally added to the rumor by saying that Apple could have been meeting with Valve because Apple is working on its own type of gaming console for the living room, and was potentially looking for partnering with Valve.

All true – except where it’s not.

In a story written by….huh….look at that….Alex Heath…he says:

We’ve gotten word that Cook was indeed at Valve yesterday…

Here’s an idea, Heath. When you are demonstrably proven wrong, apologize for your mistake and make amends. Don’t make it worse by writing another story basically making the same claims as the first one.

Oh wait…you quote your sources in both stories. So you’re doubling down on The Stupid.